Legal Opinion

Pendy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1895No. 793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and Ms punishment assessed at eight years in the penitentiary. The court did not err in permitting the State to prove, after the defendant had rested his case, that AI Daniel, the injured party, was generally called A1 Daniels. The indictment charged Ms name to be Al Daniels. The objection urged to the admission of this testimony was, that it was not in rebuttal of any evidence offered by the defendant. It did develop, however, during the examination of the witnesses, that his real name was Daniel, and not Daniels, as charged. This evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Coulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Zweig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API