Legal Opinion

United States v. Arturo Gutierrez-Espinosa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1975No. 74-3323PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

Arturo Gutierrez-Espinosa was convicted of unlawfully importing 75 pounds of marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1) and of possessing such marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). With one exception, appellant’s specifications of error are insubstantial.

The facts observed by the customs agent (the new paint job on appellant’s car, the strong odor of room deodorizer, the trembling of appellant’s hands) were relevant circumstantial evidence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Phillip Stover Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Mariano Ramirez-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. William Joseph McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Juan Rubio-VillarealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Arias-VillanuevaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API