Legal Opinion

Faulk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 1999No. 99-78PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges a final order of violation of probation. We have determined that the said order must be reversed.

The trial court found that appellant willfully and substantially violated only one condition of his probation, that appellant failed to complete the psycho-sexual treatment course which had been required. Hearsay is admissible in violation of probation hearings, but may not form the only evidentiary support for the alleged violation. See Andrews v. State, 693 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Johnson v. State, 695 So.2d 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In the instant case, the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API