Legal Opinion

Roman v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered June 3, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion for leave to submit this action to a jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur and granted defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying the motion of defendant Board of Education and reinstating the complaint as *306against it, and permitting plaintiff to proceed under res ipsa loquitur as against said defendant, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff Daniel Roman, who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Mejia v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Morris v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Morris v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Lo Presti v. Hospital for Joint DiseasesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CLAYPOOLE, CHRISTINA v. TWIN CITY AMBULANCE CORP.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Claypoole v. Twin City Ambulance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Claypoole v. Twin City Ambulance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API