Legal Opinion

Jerrell v. New York Cent. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 15, 1934No. 129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries caused by a collision on January 3, 1932, between a motorear in which he was a passenger, and a freight train, at a grade crossing in the Province of Ontario. The ease was tried on the assumption that though a passenger, the plaintiff was equally responsible with the driver for the operation of the car, and we shall treat them as one. The car was going north on a main highway; the track ran at right angles and the train was bound east; both were moving at between thirty-ñve and forty miles an hour. The crossing was protected…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Stringfellow v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  5. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. LarussiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Brennan v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Menter v. BarnesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  4. Mulberg v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API