Legal Opinion
United States v. John J. Schmidt, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 2004No. Docket 03-1690PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Per curiam
BACKGROUND
The defendant-appellant, John J. Schmidt, Jr., appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to Rule 32(e) (now Rule 11(d)) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Schmidt is one of a large number of people who were convicted of possessing child pornography following an investigation by federal law-enforcement authorities into the “Candyman Group,” a free Internet service that enabled interested people to collect and distribute child pornography and sexually explicit images of children.
On July 9, 2002, the United States Attorney for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Robert Maher, AKA "Bob M.", Peter Mancusi, Andrew GiordanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jose Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ivania Maria Couto, Also Known as Sealed Dft 35Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ryan CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Joseph MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RiverniderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jerome E. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.