Legal Opinion
Shire v. Ferdinando
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel F. Luciano, J.
Ordered that this motion by the defendant, Phillip A. Ferdinando, Jr., doing business as Club Ferdinando Corp. and doing business as After Dark Lounge, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted with respect to that portion of the first, second and ninth causes of action which are predicated on the alleged sale of alcoholic beverages to the defendants, Matthew Mazzilli and Mitchell Schipper, and *651pursuant to section 11-101 of the General Obligations Law. In all other respects the motion for summary judgment is denied.
This is an action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Havas v. Victory Paper Stock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Stevens v. KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shire v. FerdinandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990