Legal Opinion

The King v. Philip Henry Rapp

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Indictment for misdemeanor, in marrying a man to a woman who had another husband living. Moved, on the part of the defendant, to put off the trial, on affidavit of material witnesses wanting, and that he had taken the proper steps to get them. Opposed by the attorney-general, as being a criminal case, and not within the rules .of civil eases. But granted By the Court, the defendant being a clergyman, and his living depending on his acquittal: but declared not to be a precedent. (b)(b)

In Rex v. D’Eon, 3 Burr. 1513, the court said, that in all cases, whether criminal or civil, a trial shall not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1764

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1764

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API