Legal Opinion
Ronald L. Naugle v. State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1967No. 9101PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURRAH, Chief Judge.
On this appeal petitioner complains of the trial court’s refusal to appoint counsel to represent him and to grant a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the judgment.
On a plea of guilty in July, 1965, Nau-gle was convicted in the federal court of bank robbery, sentenced to serve ten years in the federal penitentiary, and is now confined in Atlanta, Georgia. About a month after imposition of sentence, he was charged in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, with the commission of a robbery in June, 1965, and a detainer was lodged against him in the federal penitentiary. In January, 1966,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Thacker v. MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- James Dwain Hampton v. The State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- General Telephone Co. of Upstate New York, Inc. v. LundyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Naugle v. FreemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Richard C. Ruip v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Lewis Wesley Huston v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- George William Daegele v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Ronald L. Naugle v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.