Legal Opinion

Spader v. McNell

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1900No. L.A. No. 958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

. APPEAL from an interlocutory judgment: 'of th'e Superior Court- of Ventura County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal from an interlocutory judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the partition of a tract of eighty acres of land referred to in the testimony and the briefs as the Jackson place. The case, briefly stated, is as follows:

It is in effect found by the court that the plaintiff is the •equitable owner of an undivided half of the Jackson place, and •of certain water stock appurtenant thereto, under a parol contract for a conveyance from the defendant to the plaintiff, and performance on the part of the latter. But the facts constituting the equitable title found are not alleged in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Southern California Commercial Co v. AlbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API