Legal Opinion

Bd. of Dir. of St. Francis Levee Dist. v. Hagan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that there was such an unreasonable delay in the presentation of the check by appellee for payment to the bank upon which it was drawn, and wherein it had funds on deposit sufficient to cover it, as to cause the loss to fall on appellee and discharge it from liability thereon.

It is true a check must be presented for payment within a reasonable time after its issue, or the drawer will be discharged from liability thereon (§ 7952, C. & M. Digest), but what is a reasonable time will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Burns v. YocumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. George H. McFadden Bros.' Agency v. KeeseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Pelt v. MarlarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Swift & Co. v. Fort Smith & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. GrauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Rice Growers' Credit Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API