Legal Opinion

Convertino v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 19, 2005No. Civil Action 04-0236(RCL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ Partial Motion [15] to Dismiss. Upon consideration of the defendants’ motion, the opposition thereto, the reply brief, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the defendants’ motion will be granted. The Court agrees with the defendants’ contention that plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”) and that the claims raised in Count I of plaintiffs Complaint therefore must be dismissed for lack of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Converting v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  2. Flores Ex Rel. J.F. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Dews-Miller v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Convertino v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API