Legal Opinion
Odom v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 5, 2001No. 1D00-2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
782 So.2d 510 (2001)
Edward Lynn ODOM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D00-2007.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 5, 2001.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
After concluding that two of appellant's claims are facially sufficient, we reverse and remand this case for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the claims that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the voluntary intoxication defense and neglecting to interview two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jackie Evans v. Leo Meyer, Warden, Logan Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Oisorio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Hester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Lawrence v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Burkett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Jung v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Nathan Renner Jung v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018