Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Oak Office Building

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1967No. Docket 1,253PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, J.

This is a negligence case brought for injury resulting from slipping and falling on an allegedly excessively waxed hallway floor. The case was tried before a jury with verdict for plaintiffs. Defendant made a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto or a new trial and upon denial of the motion has appealed.

Defendant, Oak Office Building, Inc., raises the following questions for review: (1) Was error committed by the trial court in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the ground that no evidence was introduced to make out a factual question for the jury as to defendant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Gene Deming Motor Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sparks v. LuplowMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wolverine Upholstery Company v. AmmermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Tacie v. White Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. McNabb v. Green Real Estate Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Byrnes v. Economic MacHinery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Robertson v. Swindell-Dressler Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API