State v. Joe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Stanson Kee Joe appeals from his convictions and resulting sentences for kidnapping, aggravated assault and nine counts of sexual assault. Joe contends the superior court abused its discretion in admitting pretrial statements made by the victim as prior inconsistent statements. Finding no abuse of discretion, Joe’s convictions and the resulting sentences are affirmed.
FACTS1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In December 2009, Joe came to the victim’s home while intoxicated looking for the victim’s mother, whom he was dating. The victim (who was then 17 years old) and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019