Legal Opinion
McCoy v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASS'N
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 2011No. 06-56278PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The Opinion and Dissent filed March 16, 2009, and appearing at 559 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2009), are withdrawn. They may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
OPINION
James A. McCoy (“McCoy”) brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. (“Chase”), alleging Chase increased his interest rates retroactively to the beginning of his payment cycle after his account was closed to new transactions as a result of a late payment to Chase or another creditor.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corporation Cargill, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Dave Greytak Enterprises, Inc. v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Carper v. New Castle County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021