Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to sever and dismiss seventy-three (73) entries for lack of jurisdiction. 1 Defendant claims that the entries in issue are not properly before the Court because the action was not commenced within 180 days after notice of denial of their protests was mailed to plaintiffs, as required by 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a) (1988) and 28 U.S.C. § 2636(a) (1982 and Supp. II 1984). Plaintiff counters that the notice of denial provided by Customs was not sufficient to start the statute of limitations running, and alternatively, if the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Florida, Department of Insurance, as Receiver for Southeastern Casualty & Indemnity Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cummins Engine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999