Legal Opinion

Lincoln Rochester Trust Company v. United States

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 18, 1960No. Civ. 7510PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for refund of $14,055.22, with interest, paid as a deficiency assessment on the Federal Estate Tax by the estate of Albert E. Copeland. The question is whether the estate is entitled to a marital deduction under Sec. 812(e) (1) (F) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C.A, § 812(2) (1) (F) by reason of a provision of the decedent’s Will, devising to his widow a life estate with the right to use any part of the principal thereof.

The case was submitted on a written stipulation of facts, which facts are determined to be findings of fact herein.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of Edward F. Pipe, Deceased, Nettie M. Pipe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Company, as Administrator, C. T. A., of the Last Will & Testament of Albert E. Copeland, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Piatt v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Piatt v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1961
  4. In re the Estate of BakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  5. Piatt v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API