Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 1948No. 32159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The demurrer on the ground that the plaintiff could not proceed for the interest in the note except that of Frank Cain was properly overruled. Death ordinarily terminates an agency, but where the agency is coupled with an interest the rule does not apply. We think that it is too plain to require citation of authority that, where the agent has title to the instru ment itself, he has such an interest as will prevent termination of the agency. Cases where powers of sale were held coupled with an interest seem to be analogous. Finn v. Dobbs, 188 Ga. 602 (4 S. E. 2d, 655).

In ruling that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nix v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Hollingsworth v. Georgia Fruit Growers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Tiedeman & Brother v. Imperial Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Schofield v. WoolleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Finn v. DobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Heggen v. MarentetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Duke v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Heggen v. MarentetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API