Legal Opinion

Teague v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 2009No. 1D09-874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

Appellant seeks review of a final order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because we conclude that appellant’s motion was facially insufficient, we affirm.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and two counts of possession of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. He received consecutive habitual felony offender sentences for the sale counts.

Appellant asserted in his motion that the two sale convictions occurred during a single criminal episode because the two sales…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. In Re Estate of YohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Carson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Carson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Teague v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API