Roche v. Holbrook
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCross, J.
This is a motion to change the place of trial of the above-entitled actions from Onondaga county to Otsego county.
The actions arose out of an automobile collision which occurred in Otsego county; the defendant resides in that county. The plaintiffs reside in Onondaga county. The affidavits presented in favor of and in opposition to the motion are somewhat conflicting as to *797the materiality of certain witnesses which are claimed to be material and necessary. The plaintiffs must attend the trial. One of the plaintiffs is an infant. Giving effect to plaintiffs’ claims that it will be necessary to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Groff v. Rome Metallic Bedstead Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scaccia v. County of OnondagaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Sparklin v. Jackson & Perkins Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957