Legal Opinion

Brandi Gale Differ v SSA

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 11, 2016No. 15-cv-29-JLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Brandi Gale Differ, v. Civil No. 15-cv-029-JL Opinion No.

2016 DNH 054

Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL Brandi Gale Differ has appealed the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of her application for disability benefits. An administrative law judge at the SSA (“ALJ”) ruled that, despite several severe physical impediments, Differ retains the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy, and thus is not disabled. See

2Cases cited12 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
Victoria MANSO-PIZARRO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
Jose L. GORDILS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.