Legal Opinion

Ott v. Flinspach

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill for partition. Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Puterbaugh

This-is a bill by appellee for the partition of certain real estate in the city of Bloomington. Appellant, a defendant to the original bill, filed a cross-bill in the cause seeking to foreclose a mortgage on a part of the premises, given to secure the payment of a promissory note held by his intestate. The chancellor held upon the hearing that the note in question was barred by the Statute of Limitations and dismissed the cross-bill for want of equity.

The note involved, which is for the principal sum of $1,500, is signed by Louis Flinspach, is payable to the order of Collon D. James, on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Willett v. MaxwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bowles v. KeatorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  4. Mauzey v. DazeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joseph v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Knesek v. MuznySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Wright v. StingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Holmes v. BartlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API