Chatham v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Justice.
We granted certiorari to determine (1) the merits of the defendant’s plea of double jeopardy, and (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the defendant could not complain about the court’s charging language taken from a case he cited at the foot of a written request to charge specific language.
This case is a sequel to In re Brookins, 153 Ga. App. 82, 88 (264 SE2d 560) (1980), in which the Colirt of Appeals held that the trial court abused its discretion in finding appellant’s counsel in contempt following a dispute between counsel and the State’s attorney…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- In Re BrookinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Chatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Burleson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Foody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- George v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Stroud v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.