Legal Opinion

Vinson v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLISON B. HUMPHREYS, Special Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case. The plaintiff, Mary Elizabeth Vinson, recovered a judgment for nine weeks temporary total disability and the defendants, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company and Insurance Company of North America, Incorporated, have appealed.

The brief opinion of the trial court adequately summarizes the case, the facts, and the basis for the court’s holding. The opinion is, in pertinent part, as follows:

Plaintiff was employed in the Banbury Department of Firestone where chemicals are mixed with rubber. On March 8, 1981, she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Douglass v. GRESEN MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Pieske v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Long v. Mid-Tennessee Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Chatman, Amanda v. Topre AmericaTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2014
  3. Drexel Wayne Long v. Mid-Tennessee Ford Truck Sales Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Duke, James v. Weiss PaintingTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016
  5. Frye, Annette v. Vincent Printing Co.Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API