Legal Opinion

Harry Fox Agency, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc., and Marie Snyder and Ted Snyder, Jr. D/B/A Ted Snyder Music Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 18, 1983No. 1105, Docket 83-7009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a novel question of considerable importance concerning the meaning and application of the “derivative works exception” to the termination-of-transfers provision of the Copyright Act of 1976,17 U.S.C. § 304(c)(6) (1977). At stake is whether the heirs of the composer of a song, or instead a music publishing company, are entitled to mechanical royalties from certain derivative works, in this case phonograph records. The heirs, exercising their rights under the Act, had terminated a grant to a music publishing company of all rights in the extended renewal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc. And John KeatsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol v. Louis Nizer, Doubleday & Co., Inc. And Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Litchfield v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Litchfield v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Woods v. Bourne Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API