Legal Opinion

O'Connell Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1943No. Civ. 6886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants have moved to set aside an order of this court dismissing their appeal for failure to file the opening brief within the time allowed by rule I, section 4, of Rules for Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The motion is presented on affidavits of the respective parties.

The transcript was duly filed June 23, 1942. The suit involves the title to certain quartz mining claims in Siskiyou County. The defendants aver that it is impracticable and unprofitable to mine the claims during the present war on account of the scarcity of labor, the imposition of priorities and several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drake v. DavisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1946
  2. In Re SerranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re SerranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API