Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Schreyer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is a proceeding to enforce a mechanic’s lien upon premises in the city of New York, owned by defendant Schreyer, under the mechanic’s lien law of 1863. (Chap. 500, Laws of 1863.) In 1870, one Holt contracted with Schreyer to furnish the materials and do the mason work for four buildings upon the premises in question.

Read the full summary

This is a proceeding to enforce a mechanic’s lien upon premises in the city of New York, owned by defendant Schreyer, under the mechanic’s lien law of 1863. (Chap. 500, Laws of 1863.) In 1870, one Holt contracted with Schreyer to furnish the materials and do the mason work for four buildings upon the premises in question. Holt contracted with defendant Muldoon and two others, comprising the firm of Muldoon, Kenny & Doonan, to furnish the brown stone for $5,800, payable $3,000 when the fronts were up and the balance when the stone work was completed. After the fronts were up, Muldoon’s…

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, J.,

reads for reversal of judgment of General Term, and for affirmance of judgment entered upon report of referee.

All concur except Folger, J., not voting.

Judgment accordingly.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Bockes v. WempleNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API