Kinsley v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From Rush Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Andrew E. Kinsley. From a judgment of conviction, tbe defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Erwin, J.,1. Prosecution was brought against appellant charging him with operating a “blind tiger” in the city of Rushville. Appellant undertakes to challenge the sufficiency of the affidavit in this cause, but having made an oral motion to quash in the court below without assigning any reason therefor, no question for review is presented in this court. Ward v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 524, 526, 101 N. E. 809.
2. It is contended by appellant that trial was had in the circuit court without any plea having been entered by appellant. The record shows that appellant was arraigned in the city court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Johns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Weir v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Cline v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eaton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Brackeen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Krempl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917