Legal Opinion

State v. Shepley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1989No. 16112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Sammy B. Shepley, Jr., was convicted of first degree rape. Following his conviction, defendant filed a motion for a mistrial and a motion for a new trial. These motions were based upon two comments allegedly made by the assistant state’s attorney during closing argument. The trial court denied both motions. Defendant now appeals to this court, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial and in refusing to grant him a new trial because the remarks made by the assistant state’s attorney were improper and highly prejudicial, thereby…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. DaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. DornbuschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MoriartySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wuest Ex Rel. Carver v. McKennan Hosp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MoriartySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ShepleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wuest v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API