Legal Opinion

Salinas v. Mobarak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2017No. 3D16-1543Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, plaintiff below, Jorge Salmas appeals the trial court’s involuntary dismissal of Salinas’s claims. We affirm because the evidence adduced at trial by Salinas failed to establish any of the causes of action Salinas asserted against Appellee, defendant below, Martin Mobarak. Kopel v. Kopel, 117 So.3d 1147, 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), rev’d on other grounds, No. SC13-992, — So.3d -, 2017 WL 372074 (Fla. Jan. 26, 2017) (explaining that, to establish unjust enrichment claim, evidence of plaintiff conferring direct benefit upon defendant required); Beers v. Beers, 724 So.2d 109, 116-17…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kopel v. KopelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. EDD HELMS ELEC. CONTRACTING INC. v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API