Westwood Forest Estates, Inc. v. Village of South Nyack
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBeeitel, J.
This appeal involves the constitutional invalidity of an amendment to a zoning ordinance of the Village of South ■ Nyack. The offending amendment barred the new construction of multiple dwellings throughout the village. The reason for adopting the amendment was concededly to alleviate the burden on the village’s sewage disposal plant, and not because of any requirement of or change in the comprehensive plan for the development of the village.
After a trial without a jury, the Supreme Court, in an opinion, the Appellate Division affirming, held the amendment invalid because it was not related…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Opgal, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
3Cited by16 opinions
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Smoke Rise, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Q.C. Construction Co. v. GalloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
- Wincamp Partnership v. Anne Arundel County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.