Legal Opinion
Champagne ex rel. Champagne v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided September 12, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 14930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
PUTNAM, District Judge.
This case is before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a Louisiana citizen, sues The Travelers Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation doing business in this state, which issued a liability policy covering the operations of plaintiff’s employer, Cargill, Inc., also a foreign corporation, at its salt mine at Belle Isle, Louisiana. Suit is brought against Travelers under the Louisiana Direct Action Statute, LSA-R.S. 22:655. The policy includes coverage of executive officers, directors and stockholders of the insured.
Our jurisdiction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adams v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Berry v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Berry v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maxey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Wirth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Champagne v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973