Legal Opinion · Dissent
Sessler v. McDougall
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1967No. 20,578Published
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION.
Cooper, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe we should reverse this cause, remand and instruct the trial court to sustain the Appellant’s motion for a new trial.
I agree and believe the majority opinion correctly states the law applicable in this statement of the opinion:
*362“Appellees’ Exhibit ‘L’ was the complaint for divorce of the appellant’s former wife filed by her in 1937, charging as grounds, among others, that appellant was a habitual drunkard. This exhibit was admitted into evidence during the cross-examination of appellant and over his objection.
“App…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Guenther v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ft. Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. CrosbieIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.