Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sessler v. McDougall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1967No. 20,578Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

Cooper, J.

I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe we should reverse this cause, remand and instruct the trial court to sustain the Appellant’s motion for a new trial.

I agree and believe the majority opinion correctly states the law applicable in this statement of the opinion:

*362“Appellees’ Exhibit ‘L’ was the complaint for divorce of the appellant’s former wife filed by her in 1937, charging as grounds, among others, that appellant was a habitual drunkard. This exhibit was admitted into evidence during the cross-examination of appellant and over his objection.
“App…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Guenther v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ft. Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. CrosbieIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API