Federal Defenders of San Diego Inc. v. United States Sentencing Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPORKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case, the Federal Defenders of San Diego and the Federal Pub- lie Defender for the Middle District of Tennessee, two organizations of criminal defense lawyers, have brought suit to challenge the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines issued by defendant United States Sentencing Commission. 1 Although there exists a great deal of controversy as to exactly what these new guidelines do— and what they do not do — there can be no doubt that they effect a sweeping, even revolutionary change in the method in which our…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. EstradaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1988
- United States v. SchnepperDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
- In re Wells Fargo Mortgage Modification LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025