Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Martin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 16, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

This application for a bill of particulars is granted in respect of the following matters only.

Contestants will be required to state the names and addresses of each and every person charged with undue influence and fraud. They will be required to state the place or places and the time or times where the acts alleged to constitute undue influence and fraud took place.

They will be required to state whether or not any acts of physical violence or mistreatment of decedent or threats against decedent accompanied any acts of undue influence or fraud.

They will be required additionally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of RossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
  3. Albert v. Hamilton Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrittonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of Van RiperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of CarhartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of DixNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API