Legal Opinion

Goughan v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

238 N.J. Super. 644 (1989)

570 A.2d 501

ELEANOR GOUGHAN AND RAYMOND GOUGHAN, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Burlington County.

Decided June 23, 1989.

Nicholas J. Costa for plaintiffs (Barbour & Costa, attorney).

Susan L. Moreinis for defendant.

HAINES, A.J.S.C.

This opinion considers a claim for underinsured motorist's coverage ("UIM"). It recognizes the rule that a carrier issuing a UIM policy to an automobile accident victim is entitled to a credit when the tortfeasor who caused the accident is insured. It concludes, however,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Tyler v. NJ Auto. Full Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Clarke v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Liguori v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Wolfe v. Sperling Agency, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Filippatos v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Harmon v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Overfield v. Ohio Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1998
  5. UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API