Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Chauret

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The defendants in this case executed and delivered to the plaintiff the following note:

“Bay City, Mich., March 6, 1925.
“$1,050.00.
“For value received, I promise to pay to the order of John Carroll, ten hundred and fifty dollars in weekly instalments of............................ and any further sums that may hereafter be due said John Carroll on open account from me, at the First 'National Bank, Bay City, Michigan, beginning March 6, 1925, till all of said principal sum and sums due on open account as aforesaid shall have been paid in full, with interest on all unpaid sums hereon and such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Naylor v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lashbrooks v. HathewayMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Reed v. BuysMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riess v. Old Kent BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Telmark, Inc. v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Continental Bank v. KowalskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API