United States v. Erik Lindsey Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to apply the rule of Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977), to the splintered opinion in Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S. 522, 131 S.Ct. 2685, 180 L.Ed.2d 519 (2011), to determine whether a defendant who entered into a plea agreement that recommended a particular sentence as a condition of his guilty plea is eligible for a reduced sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Erik Hughes pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses and entered into a binding plea agreement with the government, Fed. R. Crim. P.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. David MayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Kristina BoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.