Legal Opinion

State v. Rankin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 16, 2003No. 02-1577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Chief Justice.

The State appeals from the district court’s ruling on the defendant Matthew Dale Rankin’s motion to dismiss. The State contends the district court erred by interpreting Iowa Code section 124.401(5) (2001) and ruling that Rankin should have been charged with a serious rather than an aggravated misdemeanor. We agree and reverse and remand.

I.Background Facts and Proceedings.

On June 28, 2002, Rankin was convicted of possession with intent to deliver marijuana in violation of Iowa Code section 124.401(l)(d) and 124.410 (2001). His conviction was determined to be an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. State v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JentzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
  2. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State of Iowa v. Dyan Marie Lee-BrownCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Joseph Anthony SpencerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. State of Iowa v. Justin JentzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API