Legal Opinion
Briggs v. American Biltrite
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 25, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*187The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pashman, J.
We granted the petitioner’s motion for direct certification in this case pursuant to R. 2:12-2(a), 74 N. J. 155 (1977), to consider it with Watson v. Nassau Inn, 74 N. J. 155 (1977) which was also decided today. The judge of compensation awarded benefits to petitioner on the basis of the “special errand” exception to the “going and coming” rule. Observing that Watson projected the question of whether the going and coming rule should be abandoned, the parties suggested that our decision there, if answered affirmatively, would be dispositive…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bengston v. GreeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Fife v. Allied Super Markets, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- O'Donohue v. Inredeco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
3Cited by17 opinions
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Wunschel v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Doe v. St. Michael's Med. Center, NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Cremen v. Harrah's Marina Hotel CasinoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.