Legal Opinion

State v. Whitcomb

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from, Bremer District Court. The defendant was convicted of the crime of adultery, and sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for two years. He now prosecutes this appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Ch. J.

1. criminal law: adultery void decree of divorce. I. The evidence tended to prove that defendant and Roana Whitcomb were married in 1855, and that defendant prosecuted an action for a divorce in tbe district court of Floyd county, resulting in a -decree divorcing the parties, December 4th, 1872. On the 7th day of January, 1873, defendant was married to Rachel Patterson, with whom the crime of adultery.is charged to have been committed. November 13th, 1873, Roana Whit-comb filed a petition in tbe Floyd District Court to set aside and annul the decree of divorce on the ground that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Whitcomb v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Vinsant v. VinsantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. ZichfeldNevada Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bomsta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Rine v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API