Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Carthage Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 21, 1925No. 363PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The matters at bar are not very closely • related logically, so we shall take them up in separate statements of opinion.
1. As tp the alleged invalidity in to-to of the defendants’ mortgage, wo think the decision below correct. There is no contention that its form is unusual or that filing was not attended to. Argument is (a) the above-quoted provisions of the mortgage, allowing Carthago Company to sell part of its property without accounting therefor to the mortgagee, are fraudulent and vitiatory of the entire mortgage; and (b) the mortgage operated upon a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Zartman v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Titusville Iron Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Greey v. DockendorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re Leslie-Judge Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Muniz v. Rovira-MartinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Liberdar Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- MacGregor v. Johnson-Cowdin-Emmerich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Hennepin County v. M. W. Savage Factories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Brown v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.