Legal Opinion

Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Services, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1994No. 93-CA-1859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOBRANO, Judge.

This case requires the interpretation and application of the Oil Well Lien Act (the Act), La.R.S. 9:4861, et seq. Intervenors, Trans-american Energy LTD. Ill, Toce Oil Company and Crossroad Oil Company, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Guichard Drilling Company. There are two issues presented for our review. First, we must decide whether a creditor can, when executing on his oil well lien, seize the ownership interests of parties who were not made defendants in the seizure proceedings. Second, we must decide whether seizure pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Wilson v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Genina Marine Serv. v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Supreme Contractors, Inc. v. Halliburton Logging Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API