Rite Credit Tire Co. v. A. B. Williams Auto Sales Co.
City of Dayton Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Whether plaintiff or defendant was the owner and entitled to the possession of said tires and tubes at the times same were taken into possession and sold by defendant as a part of Campbell’s car, depends upon the legal effect of the ultimate facts and the terms of the instruments above recited.
In Ohio it is well established that the legal title to mortgaged chattel property is in the mortgagee.
Robinson, Jr., v Fitch, 26 Oh St 659 at page 663:
“1. A chattel mortgage in the usual form conveys (to the mortgagee the property mortgaged, and he thereby becomes the general owner of it, and in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Tips v. GayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hammel v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Walker v. VaughnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
- Lumbert v. WoodardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mechanic v. SchaefferOhio Court of Appeals · 1937