Holt v. Holt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Justice.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order increasing monthly child support payments from $125 to $300 on the basis of the increased financial ability of appellant G. R. Holt to pay. Appellant contends that, as a matter of law, his increased financial ability will not, without more, support an order increasing the amount of child support payments under Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 14.-08(c)(2). We do not agree and affirm.
On October 15, 1976, appellant G. R. Holt and appellee Wanda P. Holt were divorced. Appellant was ordered to pay child support for the parties’ minor child in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bergerac v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Moreland v. MorelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Willis v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cozby v. CozbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Watkins v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laviage v. Laviage, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983