Marzo v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,
Appellants appeal a decision of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas which affirmed appellee’s refusal of their application to continue a radiator repair business in the garage of their residence located within a residential zone. We affirm.
The parties have submitted an agreed-upon statement of the case. Appellants own and occupy property within a residential zone which is improved with a single-family detached dwelling and a detached wooden garage located 12 to 13 feet from the rear property line. Within the garage, although no sign on the premises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Horn v. Township of HilltownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Township of Haverford v. SpicaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Sheedy v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hasage v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Appeal of CrawfordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In re the Appeal of Farmland Industries, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Grove v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Center Township v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.