Legal Opinion

Anchustegui v. Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2001No. 99-35755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

After exhausting all administrative remedies, on November 18, 1997, Plaintiff An-chustegui filed a complaint in the district court in Boise, Idaho, against the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“Secretary of Agriculture”), the Forest Service, the Regional Forester, the Boise National Forest Supervisor, and the Mountain Home District Ranger. An-chustegui sought judicial review of the Forest Service’s decision to cancel his permit to graze sheep in the Mountain Home Ranger District, challenging the decision under the Administrative Procedure Act…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Department of Commerce v. United States House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Horn Farms, Inc. v. Mike Johanns, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. John Anchustegui v. Department Of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. American Raisin Packers, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
  5. Buckingham v. SECRETARY OF US DEPT. OF AGR.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API