Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Crocker

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLestes IIoltzmak, J.

In an action for a judicial separation

the plaintiff wife moves for temporary alimony and counsel fees. The action was commenced after September 1, 1967 and thus is governed by the amendments to the Domestic Eelations Law enacted in chapter 254 of the Laws of 1966. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion of necessity raises some fundamental questions involving the interpretation and effect of the new statute which should be resolved at the outset for the guidance of the Bar. Briefly, these questions are (1) whether in a separation action a motion for temporary alimony or counsel fees may be made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rusnak v. DobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Neville v. NevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Smith v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Knudson v. Flynn-HillNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Schwartz v. Madison Square Garden Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beanland v. BeanlandNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Montalvo v. MontalvoNew York City Family Court · 1968
  3. Cohen v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Loretta B. v. Gerard B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API