Legal Opinion

State v. Regan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 11, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari to review conviction under the Disorderly act.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The complaint in this case is evidently drawn under section 3 of the “Act concerning disorderly persons.” Pamph. L. 1898, p. 942.

The complaint is against the defendants jointly, and charges two offences, upon conviction for either of which the defendants could be adjudged disorderly persons.'

The conviction in the record is as follows: “Upon the law and testimony, I convicted Daniel Regan and Cornelius Regan of being guilty of being disorderly persons as charged.”

The defendants were not charged with being disorderly persons, nor could they be.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Breisia v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Breese v. WintersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Dunbar v. Board of Excise of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API